Back in the late '80s my oldest brother and his wife made the decision to homeschool their children. Everyone was completely aghast, including myself.
The major fear was, of course, the effect homeschooling would have on their children's social development. It wasn't long before our fears were proven correct. Their oldest daughter was an odd child, made more odd by the complete lack of interaction between her and other children. She seemed socially backward, and at family gatherings seemed incapable of interacting with even her own cousins.
So, when I made the decision to homeschool, my family was in complete shock. And all the same old fears bubbled to the surface. They feared my daughter would become the same awkward child as her cousins. This fear was quickly proven incorrect.
Thinking about this carefully, I think I have finally figured out what the difference was--beyond the obvious fact that each child develops as an individual, and no kids are exactly alike, that is. I believe the true difference in this case lies in the parents. No offense to my brother or his ex-wife, but neither of them are the most socially capable individuals themselves. Both of them are bright, but we always knew my brother was more book-smarts than common sense anyways. And there is nothing wrong with that.
My daughter is not socially active, and most likely she won't be--not in the typical way. She's outspoken, intelligent and friendly, but only once she gets to know you. She has no problem carrying on a conversation with most people--from the elderly to the toddlers--with the exception of the kids she previously went to school with; kids her own age. Her main obstacle to socialization comes from not understanding the workings of the typical teenage mind. She doesn't go in for cliques, she's not much into sports, and she's not allowed to watch much prime time TV. In short, she's odd. For her, socialization at school proved the biggest obstacle to learning.
I guess what I'm trying to get across in this post, is that the major argument against homeschooling is socialization, and it's a non-issue. If you're worried about the social growth of your child, sign him up for classes at the local public school - many public schools are willing to allow homeschool students to take elective courses. (It helps them with financing. Here in CO, they get at least some financial credit for ANY student taking any courses--homeschool included.) Take your children to the public pool. Have them read books to the residents at the local nursing home. Participate in programs at the local library. But don't let the old socialization argument stop you, or make you feel guilty for making the choice.
In the end, the knowledge they'll gain from homeschooling far outweighs any perceived lack of social interaction.
Friday, January 12, 2007
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
1 comments:
I find "socialization" to be an argument for homeschooling, rather than against it.
I take a look at the kids I know who go to public school and you know, I don't want my children acting like them.
I also know my daughter would have a hard time in school. She's very smart, and can be sociable, but doesn't like a lot of attention focused on her, yet speaks her mind quite freely, and can be very stubborn (hmm... wonder who that reminds me of).
Sending her to school would be like throwing her into the deep end of the "social" pool to learn how to swim. Instead, DH and I are taking more of the swimming-lessons-at-the-Y approach.
For example, I signed her up a couple of years ago with our one of our local 4H clubs. One of their "requirements" is that the child give a presentation or demonstration to the club. The first year, I pushed gently, but did not "make" her give one. Last year, I again pushed a little and she agreed to give a demonstration.
But rather than letting her sink or swim, I coached her through the process. First, I had her think of a topic. Then, I had her sit down and write out what she wanted to say about the topic. I did not try to edit - I didn't care too much about the quality of the content. I was focused more on dealing with the process.
Once she had her thoughts written out, I had her give the demonstration to me. Afterwards, I let her know some of the things she might expect from her audience and what to do about them.
She made it through the demonstration with no problems. It did help that the audience was on the small side. But I'd like to think the prep work she and I did helped too.
Post a Comment